Pen testing is an essential part of developing secure operations; It aids associations in identifying and dispelling implicit pitfalls, ensures the adaptability of web operations, and helps identify vulnerabilities before they can be exploited.
However, not all methods for pen testing are created equal. Your pen testing schedule should reflect your particular requirements, regardless of whether you are employing the agile development method, the more adaptable to the CI/CD approach.
Pen Testing in a Waterfall Development Environment
When software development systems are clearly defined and all features can be planned out in advance, waterfall development is an excellent choice. Each stage of the development process must be completed before the subsequent bone can be formed.
The waterfall development model is sometimes used by security testing companies. This is due to the fact that waterfall development is more rigid than agile and continuous development, making it difficult to switch gears in the middle of a project. It is suitable for operations that are not customer-facing, have a limited scope, and are unlikely to be streamlined frequently.
Pen testing is made simple by Waterfall development’s well-defined timelines and generally structured approach. Pen testing can be time-limited or performed after the design has been deployed in this case.
This schedule for pen testing occasionally applies to conventional pen testing.
Pen Testing in an Agile Development Environment
In contrast, agile development emphasizes speed and rigidity. This method is ideal for client-facing, complex operations that require frequent updates.
Pen testing can still be time-boxed, but the frequency must match each release cycle. Pen testing ought to be conducted more frequently because developers use short sprints to quickly develop, test, and implement new features.
For instance, if your release cycle is biweekly, you should also conduct pen tests biweekly.
The strike to this approach is both expense and speed; Executing frequent pen testing is costly, and the pen testing cycle must be finished before the subsequent sprint can begin.
Still, a continuous pen testing strategy is preferable if you want the best security content with the least amount of disruption to the development process.
Pen Testing in a Continuous Development Environment
A relatively new approach to web operation development is continuous development. Instead of traditional designs like a cascade and agile, which focus on delivering the entire design or a set of large features at once, it is based on continuously delivering bitsy updates.
DevOps and CI/CD have surfaced as vital advances to empower detachments to keep their activities secure, stable, and consistently over-to-date. Penetration testing companies embrace persistent conveyance. This is because it is ideal for essential web operations with numerous updates and intricate features. With this strategy, developers can quickly implement new features as soon as they are ready without having to wait for other features to be finished.
This new approach to development necessitates a matching pen testing strategy. In a nutshell, using a continuous development strategy necessitates ongoing pen testing. As a result, every time new code is integrated into the product, pen testing should be carried out.
With this kind of development approach, the only real way to get the most out of your security testing process is with a continuous pen testing service.
Continuous vs. Traditional Pen testing
Regular pen testing is essential for any organization that wants to ensure the safety of its web operations, regardless of whether you use agile, continuous development, cascade, or any other development methodology. Continuous pen testing is performed throughout the development process, whereas traditional pen testing typically occurs after a design has been completed.
Pen testing is typically time-boxed or completed after the design has been deployed, indicating that it only occurs at specific points in the development process. Sadly, this approach may result in security content gaps, making operations vulnerable between pen tests.
Traditional pen testing may no longer be sufficient to guarantee security as organizations move toward continuous development and implement new features and updates more frequently.
Constant pen testing, then again, gives progressing security content during all phases of the activity lifecycle. With its complex features and frequent updates, this strategy elegantly complements operations that interact with customers.
Continuous Pen Testing as a Service( PaaS)
The absence of in-house expertise can present a challenge for businesses attempting to minimize risks posed by web operations at all times. Pen Testing as a Service (PTaaS) can help with this.
The cloud-based PTaaS strategy combines manual and automated testing. Associations can rest easy knowing that their website operations are safe as they update and add new features by using PTaaS.
A PTaaS model gives a consistent approach that permits relationships to constantly test their web tasks ahead and after sending and at whatever point updates or changes are delivered. Keeping operational vulnerabilities under control makes sure that vulnerabilities are linked and addressed in real time.